NIX Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Hi all, Im thinking about buying a 944 S at some point this year. However being 23 and on an average wage, I'm concerned about running costs and that by buying a 944 it has the potential to cripple my finances and make me cry! I'm thinkin along the lines of a 2.5 S as I'm prepared to pay the insurance on this (compared to a turbo for example) and its spec isn't too bad (compared to early 2.5s). My heart says go for it but my head says hang on! I've heard the 2.5 S is spec'd to do 0-60 in 7.5 secs but given the age i'm thinkin more like 8-8.5 secs. Sound about right? Alternatively I'm thinking about going for a 2.0 20V Fiat Coupe Turbo. Of which is similar in terms of purchase and insurance costs but is newer and faster (build quality I know isn't the best tho), but also has potential to burn a huge hole in my pockets. What do you suggest? Whats it like to own a 944 S? Also how come a 2.7 is spec'd as being slower than the 2.5 S? Thanks! Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIX Posted March 22, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 PS. Hope I dont sound like some chav who just wants a fast/flash car to show off in because thats really not me. I genuinely have a passion for cars and last year finished a degree in Transport (specifically cars and m.bikes) Design. I currently drive a BMW E30 which I do enjoy and love its retro appeal. However its only a 318is and i'm looking to upgrade. Have thought about an E30 325i Sport but I wouldn't mind taking the oppurtunity to go completely different although its not totally written off as an option, especially since its more financially feasable. Opinions will be appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIX Posted March 24, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 No one got anything to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DHA Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Possibly people might not have much, if any, knowledge of 944s on TSN I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIX Posted March 26, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 thanks mate! i'll try elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mort Posted March 28, 2006 Report Share Posted March 28, 2006 I've had a 944 Turbo and an S2 - In my opinion - these are the ones to go for. The Turbo is the better one if you like speed. Its a quick car and can be tuned easily to go faster. The S2 has a very torquey engine and is may be easier to drive but not as exciting - still quick though. There's plenty about. They're pretty reliable. Parts are cheap-ish and classic insurance should keep costs down. Check out Ebay for bargains. Make sure you do an HPI check - many were crashed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomo10 Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/71077.htm This is a friends thats currently up for sale....can vouch for the condition, lovely car. Tomo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipy Posted June 11, 2006 Report Share Posted June 11, 2006 I think the 2.7 is best of the early cars last of the line with everything sorted, only made for 1989 (but i would say that as i own one), quicker than 8v 2.5 not 16v 2.5. I once tested a 20v Fiat coupe turbo around Millbrook and can safely say it left its mark. I have not driven anything like it since, Inc a Ferrari 328, Cosworth Escort, and Subaru Impreza turbo. I can see it costing any more to run than the Porsche and would give you a much newer car. The 944 is a beautifully balanced car and very easy to drive but if you’re after performance you need to look at an S2 or Turbo. Personally I’d go for the Fiat, I’ve even though of p/x the 944 for one but my daughters would kill me. Neither car is going to be cheap to run and a bad Porsche will cost more than a good one to put right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stepa1007 Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Hi all,Im thinking about buying a 944 S at some point this year. However being 23 and on an average wage, I'm concerned about running costs and that by buying a 944 it has the potential to cripple my finances and make me cry! I'm thinkin along the lines of a 2.5 S as I'm prepared to pay the insurance on this (compared to a turbo for example) and its spec isn't too bad (compared to early 2.5s). My heart says go for it but my head says hang on! I've heard the 2.5 S is spec'd to do 0-60 in 7.5 secs but given the age i'm thinkin more like 8-8.5 secs. Sound about right? Alternatively I'm thinking about going for a 2.0 20V Fiat Coupe Turbo. Of which is similar in terms of purchase and insurance costs but is newer and faster (build quality I know isn't the best tho), but also has potential to burn a huge hole in my pockets. What do you suggest? Whats it like to own a 944 S? Also how come a 2.7 is spec'd as being slower than the 2.5 S? Thanks! Nick The 944S has the rep of being the most unreliable 944. They are some bargain 944 models around. Try for a Turbo. You will never regret it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now