![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
stranger
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
|
hi all
can i just say hi to all the gals and guys out there this being my first day on this forum. been trawling a few forums but no clear answers to this issue - wandering if anyone has noticed this or can give their opinion. On my mk5 gti - 06 plate - i replaced the rcd300 with an mfd2 dvd sat nav. i found the sound production was not as good as the rcd300, especially the bass and had to get a sub. So want to change up from rcd300 in another gti - 55 plate - but considering the rns510 mfd3. Can i ask those who have swapped to sat nav if they noticed the poorer sound production and/or if anyone can say if the sound production of the mfd3 is equal to the rcd300 or better than the mfd2? thank you for any help |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 855
|
I can't give you a direct answer but I found the quality of the RNS510 better than the RCD500.
__________________
MY08 .:R32, DSG, Metallic Steel Grey, Leather, RNS 510 Sat Nav, OEM Bluetooth, Milltek Cat Back, EVOMS CAI, Haldex Gen II controller + switch, H&R ARB's (24mm F, 26mm R), Schrick 268/264 camshafts & APS Custom Remap |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| > rns510 mfd3 vs mfd2 sound production |