sayerbloke Posted October 14, 2005 Report Share Posted October 14, 2005 As seen here. Question: Does anyone know if the quoted times of: 0-62mph in 2.5 seconds 0-100mph in just over 7 seconds 0-190mph in 17 seconds are correct? Because if so, the 60-100mph time is nothing short of disappointing. To be honest, the car doesn't interest me, but I saw those times and wondered... is that for real? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D1MAC Posted October 15, 2005 Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 Sad man gets his copy of CAR out - it's 0-125 in 7 Allegedly quicker than an F1 car but still seems a touch on the tardy side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mook Posted October 15, 2005 Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 [ QUOTE ] To be honest, the car doesn't interest me, but I saw those times and wondered... is that for real? [/ QUOTE ] At only €1M, I think it's too cheap for me as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torino101 Posted October 15, 2005 Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 I thought that Bugatti had given times of: 0-62 2.5sec 0-124 7.2sec 0-186 17.5sec ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayerbloke Posted October 15, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2005 [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] To be honest, the car doesn't interest me, but I saw those times and wondered... is that for real? [/ QUOTE ] At only €1M, I think it's too cheap for me as well... [/ QUOTE ] I never liked the McLaren F1 either; I`d always have preferred an F50. Cheaper too [though I think it becomes 'money no object' when you`re talking of spending that much on a car!]. 0-125 in 7s sounds more inline with the other figures they released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruiser647 Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 [ QUOTE ] Question: Does anyone know if the quoted times of: 0-62mph in 2.5 seconds 0-100mph in just over 7 seconds 0-190mph in 17 seconds are correct? Because if so, the 60-100mph time is nothing short of disappointing. [/ QUOTE ] You cannot work out the 60-100 time like that, as the 60-100 time is froma rolling start. (from 60, in the right gear) whereas 0-62 & 0-100 are from standing starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonb Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 I dont like this car. Much prefer the early 90s EB110 or whatever it was called. Classic 90s supercar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chav Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 Well it makes me drool. Its got one hell of a kick! Wonder when the cab version is out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now