Jump to content

So who will be the first to have an electric car


CarMad
 Share

Recommended Posts

Re electric cars, I think it's about time Hollywood spilled the beans and shared their technology as I'm sure the big car manufacturers could take it to the next level.

If they can make hydrogen/nuclear fuel cells (or whatever it is they use) to fly the spaceships for the films, why can't we adapt the technology for general use? I appreciate the stuff we see in the movies is only short bursts of flight so they can film their scenes (Star Wars is the obvious example) but surely with a bit of investment, it could be adapted to provide a decent range (maybe even the lifetime of a car?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't care how fast, how economical, or how cheap they'll become.... I'll never have one. And I don't like the hybrids so far either. I'm hoping that by the time petrol cars become extinct I'll be too old to drive [opportunity for someone like Mook to say I'm already too old to drive :grin:]

Wheelchairs are electric :coffee:

:grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re electric cars, I think it's about time Hollywood spilled the beans and shared their technology as I'm sure the big car manufacturers could take it to the next level.

If they can make hydrogen/nuclear fuel cells (or whatever it is they use) to fly the spaceships for the films, why can't we adapt the technology for general use? I appreciate the stuff we see in the movies is only short bursts of flight so they can film their scenes (Star Wars is the obvious example) but surely with a bit of investment, it could be adapted to provide a decent range (maybe even the lifetime of a car?).

Very true, we don't have any need for hyperdrive systems on earth either really, I'm sure that technology could be scaled down, and the massive energy required for a single hyperdrive jump would surely be enough to propel the average car for it's entire life.

I'm also surprised at the lack of merchandising from some films, I'd love a hover board for example, and I'm sure my home security could be improved with an ED209.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately for you, I'm not going to shut up, you saying somethings a fact, doesn't make it so, I'm not sure exactly who, or what you think you are sometimes?

In my opinion the RX is smaller than both the cars you mentioned, it might be just as spacious inside, but externally, it's smaller, you've only got to look at the thing to know that.

MrMe its ok it turns out that Tipex got the measurements from his wife so you know that inch isn't quite an inch things has gone on.....

Lexus 450h vs BMW X5

Length: 187.8 inch - 183.7 in

Width: 74.2 inch - 73.7 in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MrMe its ok it turns out that Tipex got the measurements from his wife so you know that inch isn't quite an inch things has gone on.....

Lexus 450h vs BMW X5

Length: 187.8 inch - 183.7 in

Width: 74.2 inch - 73.7 in

Ahh, you went to all that effort to try and prove someone wrong on the internet, bless.

Where's that 'someones wrong on the Internet' pic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a chat with the para-olympian tech people. I imagine there are loads +++

I'd love to hear a wheelchair with a turbo pssshh dump valve :grin: (no, not a commode mod)

....Someone I know who is wheelchair-bound (bike accident) has recently converted his Mk5 GTI to a road legal track car and is able to transport his titanium+carbon wheelchair:

27.jpg

Btw, the Mk5 GTI doesn't dump air but has a recirculating valve. My Forge air intake sounds like Darth Varder though :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is Matt, it wasn't two opinions - it was one person quoting facts and another talking out of the top of their head.

Then CarMad got the great response of 'you went to all that trouble to prove someone wrong'. Umm, well yes he did actually - and you were wrong. Even then you wouldn't acknowledge it gracefully....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic Tyresmoke thread. Love a bit of argy bargy. Next it will be "Northern Monkey" and "Southern Poofter" name calling! +++

On the original topic I can't see me ever owning an electric car at least not while I have to do any kind of distance driving. I can't see how they'll ever have any kind of refill time approaching petrol/diesel/lpg/hydrogen, they're always going to take an hour or two minimum to recharge and that's just not practical when driving reasonable distances.

What are the pro's/cons about the system where you have a small engine which is used to run electric motors or recharge the batteries in the car. Are they efficient? Does anyone have any decent working examples of them out there? I don't know enough about the basic physics and power conversions rates to tell whether you'd get more efficiency out of that system than an engine driving the wheels directly?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic Tyresmoke thread. Love a bit of argy bargy. Next it will be "Northern Monkey" and "Southern Poofter" name calling! +++!

Doesn't look like it'll get that far sadly, as MrMe has childishly pressed the ignore button (apparently) as he knows he fecked up, and obviously isn't capable of defending himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What irritates me is that the whole 'raison d'etre' for electric cars is supposed to be for the sake of the environment and yet people have either forgotten or choose to ignore the very eco-UNfriendly aspects of batteries and their production and disposal. Also there is the consideration of how all that electricity needed will be produced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there are increasing power issues in this country but I think if you went down the whole electric car route it's probably worthwhile fitting a solar panel/wind turbine/geo thermal solution to your house to generate some or all of your energy needs to recharge the car, that would really pee the government off as they'd be getting no revenue and would soon drop all their subsidies. The point you make about the batteries is true though and winds me up as well, the mess they've made in some parts of the world strip mining the materials is truly shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there are increasing power issues in this country but I think if you went down the whole electric car route it's probably worthwhile fitting a solar panel/wind turbine/geo thermal solution to your house to generate some or all of your energy needs to recharge the car, that would really pee the government off as they'd be getting no revenue and would soon drop all their subsidies. The point you make about the batteries is true though and winds me up as well, the mess they've made in some parts of the world strip mining the materials is truly shocking.

They would just change the rules and invent a tax to restore their revenue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have a legit reason for getting one, i would also recharge it extemely cheaply by plugging it in when i get to my office! I dont think i would be declaring that leccy on my return ;)

But i just cant see it happening, plus there quite expensive and while i havent in the past been against spending money on cars i want the electric models are just to expensive. They neither make sense financially (price to buy vs unknown resale) nor in a desire to buy it b/c none of them seem that great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The argument about mining for the batteries being unsustainable is itself unsustainable, though. The more we get on board with battery tech, the quicker it will progress (hopefully) so that soon we might find some better materials with better charge qualities. Investment should be made down this road, but it shouldn't really come from consumers. This is what research grants are for IMO. Sadly, there aren't many uses for battery tech in military applications :grin:

The same can be said for solar power too. A lack of investment means that pv cells have rubbish efficiency and until they're beefed up, they're not really worth pushing to consumers, but in order to get the investment to fund the research they are being pushed.

If we can get obstacle avoidance and auto braking tech going a bit better, surely we can cut down on safety features like crash zones and therefore weight. = better economy and higher performance. +++

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...