Improved 300C

[News_Stig]

From the News Section........

http://www.tyresmoke.net/forum/tsn-motor-news/130092-improved-300c.html#post1525029

[Booster]

Well it could hardly get any worse!! Mook might get one now

[cruiser647]

Looking at the picture of the front of the car, I think those DRLs will out bling the Audi ones!

[Busby]

I don't think that looks too bad. Admittedly the DRL's are a bit too much but I like the new sloping back end. I know they're not the most dynamic car in the world but for cruising the motorway I imagine there are worse (and better) things out there for the same money. You certainly get a shed load of kit in them.

As a mile-muncher, I can understand why a year old one would have appeal but my concern would be whether it would cope with big mileage (c. 100k in 3 years) at all well.

[cruiser647]

I don't think that looks too bad. Admittedly the DRL's are a bit too much but I like the new sloping back end. I know they're not the most dynamic car in the world but for cruising the motorway I imagine there are worse (and better) things out there for the same money. You certainly get a shed load of kit in them.

As a mile-muncher, I can understand why a year old one would have appeal but my concern would be whether it would cope with big mileage (c. 100k in 3 years) at all well.

Agreed. I doubt the interior would take it (the previous one anyway). Engine and gearbox would be fine.

[Tipex]

300c mechanicals are ok, not brilliant, but the interior is the weakest area, very flimsy.

This just looks like a toned down version of the 300c, almost like a 200c, and really removes the only reason you'd buy one, because you want to look arrogant*.

*although the drls will help somewhat.