sayerbloke Posted February 14, 2005 Report Share Posted February 14, 2005 At the 1994 annual awards dinner given by the American Association for Forensic Science, AAFS President Don Harper Mills astounded his audience in San Diego with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story... On 23 March 1994, the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he had died from a shotgun wound to the head. The decedent had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide (he left a note indicating his despondency). As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the descendent was aware that a safety net had been erected at the eight floor level to protect some window washers and that Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide because of this. Ordinarily, Dr. Mills continued, a person who sets out to commit suicide ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended. That Opus was shot on the way to certain death nine stories below probably would not have changed his mode of death from suicide to homicide. But the fact that his suicidal intent would not have been successful caused the medical examiner to feel that he had homicide on his hands. The room on the ninth floor from which the shot gun blast emanated was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing and he was threatening her with the shotgun. He was so upset that, when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window striking Opus. When one intends to kill subject A but kills subject B in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject B. When confronted with this charge, the old man and his wife were both adamant that neither knew that the shotgun was loaded. The old man said it was his long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her -- therefore, the killing of Opus appeared to be an accident. That is, the gun had been accidentally loaded. The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun approximately six weeks prior to the fatal incident. Apparently the mother had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of the father to use the shotgun threateningly, secretly loaded the gun with an expectation that his father would shoot his mother. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus. An exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed that the son had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him, Ronald Opus, to jump off the ten-story building on March 23, only to be killed by a shotgun blast through a ninth story window. The medical examiner closed the case as a suicide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walter_the_great Posted February 14, 2005 Report Share Posted February 14, 2005 woah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ari Posted February 14, 2005 Report Share Posted February 14, 2005 A good tale, but... http://www.snopes.com/horrors/freakish/opus.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayerbloke Posted February 14, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2005 I heard this a couple of years ago and was never too sure whether it was true or not. Thanks for clearing it up "But there is some truth to it, for there is a Don Harper Mills, and he did tell this very story at a meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences" At least the fact it was told, when, who to and who it`s attributed to is correct! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now