Bison1379134007 Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 anyone know what the 0-100mph time on the r32 is supposed to be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 11seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brabus Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 No way...its more like 16 or 17 secs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie123 Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 Autocar tested it at 15.6 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 Yup he is right autocar did record it at, 15.6 secs, wish it was 11 though blue. Maybee if i stuck a turbo in it, yeah.... 3.2twin sounds good ayy!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 [ QUOTE ] 3.2twin sounds good ayy!? [/ QUOTE ] yep and then they call it RS3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison1379134007 Posted April 23, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 15.6 seconds? ave a word! does anyone know a REALLY good index of sprint times n stuff? maybe we should make one here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Posted April 26, 2003 Report Share Posted April 26, 2003 Borrow my racetech and do it properly. If you want a faster time I could try towing you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted April 26, 2003 Report Share Posted April 26, 2003 How much do racetechs cost, and is it possible to rent them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SammyS3 Posted April 28, 2003 Report Share Posted April 28, 2003 Bison, I dont know if its a REALLY good index of times, but ive always enjoyed www.track-challenge.com as the pub argument settler on acceleration etc. Sorry I'm not very internet tech , otherwise that would be a link! Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SammyS3 Posted April 28, 2003 Report Share Posted April 28, 2003 oh it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CARACTERE 007 Posted April 28, 2003 Report Share Posted April 28, 2003 feckim me..MTM Audi S3 376bhp 4,5sec 0-100km! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceman Posted April 29, 2003 Report Share Posted April 29, 2003 R32 doesn't look so hot in the track challenge tests. R32 0-100km 7.1 secs V6 4Motion 0-100km 7.3 secs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SammyS3 Posted April 29, 2003 Report Share Posted April 29, 2003 True, the r32 0-60 times sound a bit suss really. S3 0-60: 6,7 0-100: 17,1 R32 0-60: 7,1??? 0-100: 16,6 maybe one of you owners should lend them a better example to test! Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted April 30, 2003 Report Share Posted April 30, 2003 I don't get that every review of the car states that the R32 is a faster car than the S3 even 0-60. I have heard that the ratios are very short ranged in the early gears which makes the 0-60 times slower. I want to know what the 0-60/100 times are for the AMD conversion car. Bet thats the bollo**s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison1379134007 Posted April 30, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 30, 2003 i haven't seen the figers but from driving it i could well belive that 2nd is shorter leaving you at about 55 ish... i'll test it to the red line tonight and see that the deal is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted May 1, 2003 Report Share Posted May 1, 2003 I think 55ish probaably sounds right. Do you remember what the S3 redlined at in second gear?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison1379134007 Posted May 1, 2003 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2003 ok it is 55 miles per hour on the 6.5K in second gear... slightly lower than the s3 i think... or did the s3 go to 6.8k? maybe thats what it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted May 2, 2003 Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 There we go it is that gear change which slows down the 0-60 time. the question is what is the 0-55 time? Da da da Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted May 2, 2003 Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 Also apparently with the AMD coversion the gold can rocke to 100 in 12.6ish secs, bit of an improvement over the 15.6... The exhausts look great also and apparently make a much better noise. I am seriously considering it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SammyS3 Posted May 2, 2003 Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 I have to say that I think 12.6 0-100 sounds a bit hopeful, thats only just down on an RS4! (Evo have it as 12.1) We reckoned a chipped S3 would do it in about 13.5-14.5 depending on the car and conditions. That has a similar output to the AMD R32 and is slightly lighter IIRC, so I imagine the two's times will be pretty much inseperable. Sorry! Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lagoo Posted May 2, 2003 Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 [ QUOTE ] Also apparently with the AMD coversion the gold can rocke to 100 in 12.6ish secs, bit of an improvement over the 15.6... The exhausts look great also and apparently make a much better noise. I am seriously considering it. [/ QUOTE ] sorry woppum cant believe that in the slightest... my tuscan knocks out near on 390bhp and weights a mere 1000kg and is in the late 11 early 12's......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison1379134007 Posted May 2, 2003 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2003 really? i alwyas thought the 4.0 litre tuscan and the super light 4.5 cerbera did 100 sub 10?? maybe not only one way to find out i guess... whats your source on the 12.x? does sound VERY fast... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woppum Posted May 3, 2003 Report Share Posted May 3, 2003 You are right i was reading a post on a different forum about the AMD re-tune and one guy quoted this.. 'Well, if it's anything to go by - last year with 282bhp and FWD I managed a 12.3 0-100....' I must have simply misread it and stated poor information. Sorry i think i was bieng a bit hopeful considering a porche twin is just under 10.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now