Jump to content

CLIO 182 Vs CIVIC TYPE R


Don1981
 Share

Recommended Posts

These are my choices. i already posted about this, but cant find it anywhere??

So which would you choose and why?

Few other questions:-

reliability, which 1?

performace?

any thing else

budget = £8500

I am looking to buy 1 of the above, but cant make my mind up, maybe some of you here could help?. Does worry me about the burberry cap thing lol.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you driven both yet?

If you prefer one more than the other to drive, I'd say go for that one. Yes, there are other considerations, but as I don't think either are majorly lacking in any of the important areas, I'd go with the one which puts the biggest smile on your face. That's a big part of what cars like that are about, right? 169144-ok.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take sayerbloke's advice and go with the one which puts the biggest smile on your face. Ignore the Burberry cap aspect....As long as you are happy it matters diddlysquat what others think. Some people will attach images to you and pigeon-hole you whatever car you drive. Just borrow a Ferrari and see what reaction you get!

Personally I think I would choose the Honda for its excellent engine and upper power.

Enjoy 169144-ok.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ QUOTE ]

The Type R is better IMO. The reliability is far better. You do have to wind up the Type R to get anything out of it, but it's great fun none the less grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

What he said, the Clio is more accessible fun than the Civic, but if you're going to go for the clio, pay the extra and get a trophy cup model ECLIPSe.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had both from new, the Type R feels quicker (although performance figs there's hardly anything in it), more solid and sounds great, fairly good driving position. The clio has more gadgets, cruise, rain sensitive wipers, automatic xenon headlights and so on. Feels more fun however I did not like the driving position (seat feels to high). Both are crap in the wet.

If I had to pick, i'd probably go for the new clio trophy 182, loads of gadgets small and great fun. The Type R has to be driven hard but when it is that grin soon appears!!

Test em both, you'll know which one you want.

Good Luck! 169144-ok.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry to go on, on this subject - i closed off my half way point on my existing car today with the finance company and out of curiosity i asked the mechanic who inspected my car about both civic and sport clio. He roared with laughter about the clio saying it was unreliable and would have a lot fo problems. He bowed down about the civic though. I was vertually all set to go for the 182 cup till then. I never heard the car have such a slagging. Also seen as the fella has many cars coming his way on a daily basis i have to take his word for it. What are your thoughts? ECLIPSe.gif?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well im a mechanic, and i would agree with that! Id say the honda is twice the car! You,ll get 100k out a honda without a bit of bother other than routine serviceable items! renault on the other hand, they demolish brake discs, coils, driveshafts, steering racks and the sunroofs on the clios start to rattle after a few years!

Just to add, i work in a independant renault specialist so spent alot of time fixing them! And i really cant rate them!

But thats jst my mechanical opinion which isnt based on there performance, cost and so on.

Id take the civic all day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would recommend the Civic (just about) but if you spend your time on bumpy back roads then the Clio might be a better shout.

Civic has a better engine and gearbox combo (definitely the 'box, which is one of the best around) and more room but the ride can be a bit choppy and there is no kit (if that's your thing). The Clio will be more fun for more of the time but might be fragile.

However, just to disagree with the grease boys to a degree, the Civic isn't always a paragon of Honda reliability - I've had two steering racks and half a front suspension fitted in 2 1/2 years, plus a botched new clutch and an engine that won't idle properly (so I'm looking to palm it off but can't decide on a replacement). Having said that, it's never failed to start or strand me.

Thing is, on the budget you're talking about a Clio would be an 04 or better with decent miles and still under warranty. A Civic would be around a 52 plate with 50k+ and no warranty, unless from a dealer.

What about alternatives - Leon, ST170, Impreza, nice Accord Type R, 3 series etc etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread makes interesting reading, as the clio 172/182 is one of the cars i'll be looking at when i return to the UK. For some reason just doing initial insurance quotes on elephant, they won't touch me on a civic type R but its not too bad on a clio.

They're not too dis-similar power outputs ~20 bhp so whats the reason for that, is it theft desirability? confused.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

awrite there , just bought a clio 182 , test drove both the type r , and the clio, and just thought from the off...... the clio was alot more fun, everyone has different opinions, but after test driving them both... the clio for me was the better choice, such a small car.. with soo much power its unreal

the reason i joined the forum was really to ask advice on the clio.... just baught it, and i dont want to really modify it, except lowering it? i want it as low as possible without it rubbing, and without having to go to the expense of coilover.. any ideas??? was just going to go for the 30mm springs.. but would i get away with a little bit more of a drop? any ideas appreciated cheers :grin::grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...